Lawsuits & Settlements
Get updates on drug lawsuits, settlements and PAL news
Are You Fed Up with High Drug Prices? Get Involved. Tell Us Your Story.

Past Lawsuits

Wellbutrin

To receive updates about this case please click here!

About Wellbutrin®
Wellbutrin is a drug used to treat depression. It is chemically different from Paxil, Prozac and Zoloft, and as a result, Wellbutrin can often successfully treat people with depression whose condition has not improved from taking these other drugs. Wellbutrin's generic name is bupropion hydrochloride, and GlaxoSmithKline also markets bupropion as Zyban®, an aid for smoking cessation. While the main ingredient of Wellbutrin has been off-patent for several years, its extended-release formula, Wellbutrin SR, is not. A standard daily dosage of Wellbutrin SR costs $102.05 for a 30-day supply. By comparison, a 30-day supply of generic bupropion hydrochloride, without extended-release properties, costs $66.14.

Wellbutrin PAL Member Lawsuit Summary
In July, 2002, PAL filed suit against GlaxoSmithKline, maker of Wellbutrin® and Wellbutrin SR. The lawsuits allege that Glaxo filed baseless patent lawsuits against generic drug companies in order to delay the manufacture and sale of generic versions of Wellbutrin SR. The result of this misuse of the patent system is that people suffering from depression were forced to pay higher prices for extended-release versions of a medication vital to their mental health. Glaxo also reaped benefits through the marketing of bupropion hydrocloride under the name Zyban® as an aid for smoking cessation. In 2001, worldwide sales of Wellbutrin generated revenues of over $ 1.1 billion dollars for drug companies GlaxoSmithKline and SmithKline Beecham.

While the active ingredient of Wellbutrin and Zyban has been off patent for nearly ten years, in 1995 Glaxo received a patent for the extended release formula of Wellbutrin SR. In 1999, generic drug manufacturer Andrx filed two ANDAs with the FDA seeking to sell generic versions of extended release Wellbutrin and Zyban. Andrx argued that because its generic used a different method of extended release, that it did not infringe on Glaxo's patent. Four other generic manufacturers followed Andrx's lead, and several have received tentative approval to manufacture and market their generic versions. In spite of this, these generics have not come to market because of Glaxo's anti-competitive actions.

In September of 1999, Glaxo filed a patent infringement case against Andrx, triggering automatically a 30 month stay on production and marketing of Andrx's generic versions of Wellbutrin and Zyban. In spite of a decision against Glaxo in April, 2001, by the PTO the company continued to pursue the patent infringement suit, delaying the entry of generics into the market and thereby earning it millions in monopoly-priced profits from sales of Wellbutrin and Zyban. This is, therefore, another case of consumers paying more for a patented drug because the brand name manufacturer has manipulated the patent system to keep a generic off the market.

The PAL case was voluntarily dismissed in 2003 following an adverse appeals court decision in the Andrx patent litigatin. However, the case was refiled in December 2004 after subsequent positive appeals court decisions in patent cases involving two other generic competitors. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on March 23, 2005. The Defendants'  motion to dismiss has been denied.

Update October 2008: A motion to certify an end-payor class was filed on June 29, 2006, and briefing and argument on the motion were concluded on July 31, 2008. A decision is pending.  

In the meantime, defendant GlaxoSmithKline submitted a motion for summary judgment on their patents on October 20, 2008.   



Wellbutrin Class Members
Class members of PAL's litigation include individuals who have paid out-of-pocket costs for Wellbutrin SR since September 1999.

 

Resources:
Wellbutrin Complaint